From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 28 16:34:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6FA16A4CE for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C7F43D3F for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:34:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.8]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HVB00JQ1AN64K@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:28:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml4so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.148]) by pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0HVB009Y9AN87C20@pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:28:20 -0700 (MST) Received: from sirius (h68-144-47-89.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.47.89]) 2003))freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:28:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:28:10 -0700 From: Dan MacMillan In-reply-to: <200403282242.44221.jorn@wcborstel.nl> To: Jorn Argelo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Subject: RE: Hi I have a suggestion! To Imporve the perfect Freebsd! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:34:14 -0000 > From: Jorn Argelo > Sent: March 28, 2004 13:43 > > ... > > By the way, I don't think that "nerdly" is an appropiate way to > adress the folks. They do great work. Perhaps I always saw it > wrong, but I find nerd a negative way to describe a person who > has interests in computers. > > ... Agreed. The correct term is "geeky". -Dan