From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 21:23:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE4F37B401 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BFC43FE5 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:23:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12389; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:23:38 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030626222202.02c9b560@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:23:35 -0600 To: "Michael Carr" , "FreeBSD Chat" From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <005801c3535b$72d1fe80$59eb30d5@pbncomputer> References: <026301c352eb$1e5b54c0$2aed30d5@pbncomputer> <4.3.2.7.2.20030625214311.00e5e240@localhost> <20030626070537.GB91605@droso.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: RMS says: "Use BSD, for goodness sake!" X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:23:47 -0000 At 03:50 AM 7/26/2003, Michael Carr wrote: >What's interesting is that Stallman asserts a GPL'd kernel wouldn't be >necessary to any "GNU operating system" ("Today, GNU runs with various >kernels . . . It is basically the same system, whichever kernel you use"), >and that at no point does he assert the moral or political necessity for a >copylefted mode of licensing, but merely lists provisions common to both the >GPL and BSDL ("users are free to run it, study it No, they're not. They can't study GPLed code without risking "GPL infection." >and change it . . . Ditto. >redistribute it . . . Not unless they want to give up their rights to their modifications. --Brett