From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jul 8 8:32:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C847037B401 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 08:32:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f68FVfU90366; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 09:31:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200107081531.f68FVfU90366@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , Peter Wemm , Will Andrews , Jason Evans , Bill Fenner , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Jul 2001 16:34:52 +0200." Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 09:31:41 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group writes: >> Setting undolevels=0 causes vim to have the same undo/redo behaviour as >> vendor vi and nvi. > >Nope, nvi has multiple undo levels (not sure how many), press '.' >after pressing 'u' to undo additional levels. I'm forced to use VIM under Linux and personally think that VIM just doesn't cut it. :split instead of :E, the funky undo behavior, the format of the status line, etc, etc. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message