Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:27:26 -0400 From: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET> To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun Ultra 2 and hme not in full duplex Message-ID: <oqr7d16f5d.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> In-Reply-To: <448B9B98-A700-4978-9A0B-914376D43AD6@reusel.de> (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Reisenweber's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:27:55 %2B0200") References: <20050810073802.GB9599@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <1123679824.23377.240381298@webmail.messagingengine.com> <448B9B98-A700-4978-9A0B-914376D43AD6@reusel.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Aug_10_10:27:13_2005-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>>> "jr" =3D=3D J=F6rg Reisenweber <me@reusel.de> writes:
    jr> try to pass "media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" to ifconfig
    jr> in your rc.conf.
Doing that could interfere with autodetection and make your switch
think the link is half-duplex, so if you do that you must verify the
duplex setting on the switch is still right.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html#auto_neg_valid
see the rows marked Note 1 in the above table.
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Aug_10_10:27:13_2005-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
iQCVAwUAQvoOzonCBbTaW/4dAQJ6nAQAntLols9jHspQ8bMi4OCAGzfoiWaiIKBw
iZyY0Ob+qbtwtuxnJGlcmBKg4gVRTwHDKcmgkMSSmzYeBeqbTUY8faleQ0ezMS93
ZQOPhxn9FdTjSvOwZXJ1m16GSO9HwJd5U4pEwIc2XCEkwSIQ9ika0kRwktCUqxjZ
qTBGCQXPVVU=
=UJQc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Aug_10_10:27:13_2005-1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oqr7d16f5d.fsf>
