Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 11:37:41 -0800 (PST) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -lc vs. -lc_r (building Apache-PHP) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9912271136420.6973-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> In-Reply-To: <199912271852.NAA75978@rtfm.newton>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Tom once stated: > > =On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > = > =... > => What's the magic and why doesn't the port know it? Why is -lc even in > => play if some of the components (-lmysqlclient) require -lc_r? Yours, > = > = libmysqlclient does not require -lc_r, because the library does not > =use threads. Only mysqld is threaded. > > Thank you, Tom, for this correction. However, this does not change much. > Some other extension wants threads then... Uhh.. highly unlikely. Almost none of PHP3 is thread-safe, and only a bit of Apache is thread-safe. I doubt that anything in the Apache-PHP port wants or needs threads. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9912271136420.6973-100000>