From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Apr 12 22:00:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DA1D3B5BF for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B5E808 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v3CM053g041842 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:00:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218571] umtx compat6 regression affecting 'jar' command Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:00:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: nicholas.hardison@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:00:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218571 --- Comment #2 from Nicholas Hardison --- It isn't practical to recompile the jdk in this environment due to its loca= tion on a shared filesystem (with a bunch of other stuff) and need to be able to continue running the 8.2 systems as I do the upgrades (a multi-stage process that happens over a period of months, during which work must go on). I started working in this freebsd environment back when it was running 4.8,= and the binary compatibility has been a major selling point of FreeBSD through upgrades since then (though my regression tests don't cover product versions from that long ago - iirc we don't need it _quite_ that far back). Being a= ble to replace the environment with new systems that can still run the old toolchains keeps me from having to keep and support my current set of 8.2 servers for X more years (they're too old as it is - ironically one of the reasons I could finally justify upgrading is the need to run a _new_ jdk). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=