From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 5 14:40:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9ABC16A4DE for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chris-j.net) Received: from mail1.toplevel.net.au (mail1.toplevel.net.au [150.101.78.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D0D43D53 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chris-j.net) Received: from mail1.toplevel.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.toplevel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F16451B3; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:10:29 +0930 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at toplevel.net.au Received: from [127.0.0.1] (chris1.joneshome.net [192.168.0.103]) by mail1.toplevel.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707B24509B; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 00:10:28 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <44FD8C8E.6050708@chris-j.net> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:11:18 +0930 From: Chris Jones User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ron Tarrant References: <44FD7AD2.5010000@sympatico.ca> <44FD8216.8070100@chris-j.net> <44FD850B.6050005@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <44FD850B.6050005@sympatico.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports Update: Failed to Generate INDEX X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:40:32 -0000 Ron Tarrant wrote: > Chris Jones wrote: >> Instead of regenerating the INDEX, why not just download it? >> >> # cd /usr/ports >> # make fetchindex >> >> Regards, >> Chris Jones >> > Thanks for the reply, Chris. > > Yup, good idea. I did this and found out that INDEX-6 was already > up-to-date. Could this be why index generation failed? > > -Ron T. > Shouldn't have mattered... all that would happen is the generated INDEX would've overwritten the downloaded one.