From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 05:02:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFBD37B401 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0231243F85 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:02:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 82668 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2003 12:02:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chuck.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.12) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2003 12:02:26 -0000 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:02:35 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: Clement Laforet Message-Id: <20030810140235.7863088b.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20030810041524.4de00c9c.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <000a01c35eab$141588c0$5500000a@skullbook> <20030809221438.360003ad.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <000c01c35ec2$28ff1d20$5500000a@skullbook> <20030810002015.37cdfc24.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <20030810011104.GE43222@dan.emsphone.com> <20030810041524.4de00c9c.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) X-Face: ._cVVRDn#-2((lnfi^P7CoD4htI$4+#G/G)!w|,}H5yK~%(3-C.JlEYbOjJGFwJkt*7N^%z jYeu[;}]}F"3}l5R'l"X0HbvT^D\Q&%deCo)MayY`);TO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: mikael.karlsson@saunalahti.fi cc: dnelson@allantgroup.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql-server-4.0.10 packag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:02:40 -0000 On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 04:15:24 +0200 Clement Laforet wrote: > and now the big question is why index consider MySQL With the end it will be easier to understand :) and now the big question is why INDEX considers MySQL 3.23 as dependency required by p5-DBD-mysql...