Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:02:35 +0200 From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> To: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql-server-4.0.10 packag Message-ID: <20030810140235.7863088b.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20030810041524.4de00c9c.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <000a01c35eab$141588c0$5500000a@skullbook> <20030809221438.360003ad.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <000c01c35ec2$28ff1d20$5500000a@skullbook> <20030810002015.37cdfc24.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <20030810011104.GE43222@dan.emsphone.com> <20030810041524.4de00c9c.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 04:15:24 +0200 Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> wrote: > and now the big question is why index consider MySQL With the end it will be easier to understand :) and now the big question is why INDEX considers MySQL 3.23 as dependency required by p5-DBD-mysql...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030810140235.7863088b.sheepkiller>