From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Oct 11 0: 9:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.169.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C0837B403 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 00:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tedm.placo.com (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.168.154]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f9B799T00634; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 00:09:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Doug Barton" , Cc: , "Salvo Bartolotta" , "P. U. (Uli) Kruppa" , Subject: RE: Use of the UNIX Trademark Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 00:09:09 -0700 Message-ID: <009f01c15223$9f7718c0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <3BC542A8.CF17D159@DougBarton.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >-----Original Message----- >From: doug@yahoo-inc.com [mailto:doug@yahoo-inc.com]On Behalf Of Doug >Barton >Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:57 PM >To: tlambert2@mindspring.com >Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu; Salvo Bartolotta; Ted Mittelstaedt; P. U. >(Uli) Kruppa; freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG >Subject: Re: Use of the UNIX Trademark > > >Terry Lambert wrote: > >> Just like if I park my car in front of your >> house for 5 years, and then you decide to buy an RV and tell >> me to not park there any more so you can park your RV: the >> fact that you didn't stop me for the 5 years previous means >> that I have established an interest in that parking spot. > > This is really a horrendous example for a number of reasons. A much >better example that illustrates the point you're trying to make would be >something like, "If I build a fence that sits on and/or encloses part of >your property, the longer the fence exists without you objecting to it >the stronger my case for a prescriptive lien, and ultimately title of >the property passing over to me." > Even this example has flaws - because the property boundary must be acceptable to local laws and regulations. In most cities there's a minimum lot density as well as a minimum distance the property line must be from any structure. You can build a fence in the wrong place and the neighbor may not object - but if moving the property line will put it too close to the neighbor's house or make his lot fall below the minimum lot size, then the city isn't going to issue a new deed no matter what lien you get. Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message