From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 22 13:38:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179651065674; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6818FC2A; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3MDKXAX076735; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:20:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <480D3D5F.3060704@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:20:31 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <200802151440.m1FEeGVr084431@lava.sentex.ca> <20080215085714.K79197@mail.rsts.org> <47B5F7BF.9050608@FreeBSD.org> <20080219145105.C96725@mail.rsts.org> <20080220172216.GM57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080221030314.Q2297@mail.rsts.org> <20080221121322.GO57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080422103145.GA17645@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20080422115407.GP18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <480DD532.9000203@FreeBSD.org> <20080422121145.GQ18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20080422121145.GQ18958@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Brett Bump , Andre Albsmeier , Mike Tancsa , Kris Kennaway , scottl@freebsd.org, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:38:40 -0000 Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:08:18PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: >>>> On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett Bump wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both >>>>>>> GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Check for partially applied patch. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Kostik. You can double check me on sizes, but it would appear >>>>>> that >>>>>> all files in the patch were touched, and I double checked my sources >>>>>> with: >>>>>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/src which >>>>>> are >>>>> The patch is against RELENG_6, not against RELENG_6_2. I see no point >>>>> in backporting it to RELENG_6_2. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another deadlock with snapshots and >>>>> quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block already freed" panic and followed >>>>> up fsck: softdep inconsistency error. >>>>> >>>>> New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at >>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080221-1202.patch >>>> I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources >>>> but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due to >>>> changes to the tree after the above patch was made. >>>> >>>> Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to make >>>> one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources? >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080422-1000.patch >>> >>> May be, I shall commit it finally. >> FYI scottl@ was asking about this yesterday, and seemed interested in >> helping you to get it committed if necessary. > > My worry is the possible mismerge. I do prefer to commit it now, after > some authoritative "no problem seen" message. I'll merge it into the FreeBSD 6 tree at Yahoo, get some testing done on it, and then let you know how it goes. Scott