From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Dec 13 19:56:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from linux.ssc.nsu.ru (linux.ssc.nsu.ru [193.124.209.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB10D154DF for ; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:56:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru) Received: (qmail 23275 invoked from network); 14 Dec 1999 03:56:04 -0000 Received: from inet.ssc.nsu.ru (62.76.110.12) by hub.freebsd.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 1999 03:56:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (danfe@localhost) by inet.ssc.nsu.ru (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA05170 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:55:55 +0600 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:55:55 +0600 (NOVT) From: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Some ?s about CVSup In-Reply-To: <19991212154246.B50199@bank-pedersen.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! I just have a few ?s to make thing clearer: 1). Does it make sense to CVSup -RELEASE sources? And, is -RELEASE brance just a -STABLE + packages compiled from ports that were latest to the day of release? If so, would CVSuping -RELEASE act like CVSuping -STABLE? I restate this: If I CVSup my 3.3-RELEASE, will I get latest -STABLE (3.x branch)? Or I have to stick with -STABLE from the very beginning to be able to update system sources? 2). There've been a message ported several days ago, when someone was saying that generally performance of -RELEASE tends to be greater than that of -STABLE. Anyone has comments on this? Regards, ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message