From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 15 11:32:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bdr-xcon.is.matchlogic.com (bdr-xcon.is.matchlogic.com [206.132.16.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB78F37BD90 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:32:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crandall@matchlogic.com) Received: by bdr-xcon.is.matchlogic.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:32:00 -0700 Message-ID: <5FE9B713CCCDD311A03400508B8B30137DA545@bdr-xcln.is.matchlogic.com> From: Charles Randall To: Howard Leadmon Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Buffer Problems and hangs in 4.0-CURRENT.. Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:28:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG That's not spurprising. When I tried it, Solaris 2.6 x86 didn't support full-duplex 100Base-TX on very many devices. The DEC tulip cards were one of the few that had drivers that supported full-duplex. Charles -----Original Message----- From: Howard Leadmon [mailto:howardl@account.abs.net] Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 4:24 PM To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Buffer Problems and hangs in 4.0-CURRENT.. ... I used the DEC based cards as I had seen so many people raving about them, and at least under Solaris they claim the DEC tulip based boards are the hot ticket. ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message