Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 22:25:10 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227127] www/squid-devel: update to 4.0.24, add BDB option Message-ID: <bug-227127-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227127 Bug ID: 227127 Summary: www/squid-devel: update to 4.0.24, add BDB option Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: ncrogers@gmail.com CC: timp87@gmail.com CC: timp87@gmail.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(timp87@gmail.com) Created attachment 191994 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D191994&action= =3Dedit update to 4.0.24, add BDB option This patch updates squid-devel to the latest version 4.0.24. http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/squid-announce-Squid-4-0= -24-beta-is-available-td4685043.html I've also included an option to exclude Berkeley DB support, as my organiza= tion has concerns over its license. bdb was recently added to USES in this commi= t: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D438126 The "BDB" option seems to follow the general ports convention of how bdb support is included or not. Only the ext_session_acl and ext_time_quota_acl require Berkeley DB support, so it seems safe to optionally exclude it. To = be consistent with the new behavior of this port I've enabled BDB by default. Perhaps there is a more appropriate way to configure this? I've also tried including support for the ext_session acl helper, which also relies on BDB. Thanks for your consideration. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227127-13>