From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 8 11:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED2F16A417 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFB743D58 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:24:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1238265wxd for ; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:24:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZtgTebaaSW4VTSNFapmnyjXA4XmS7YrZryZP1B+PGq9dHa9caCYB8H+pCq9B0SBpfTLvD03mr5QY+GDWILfGDzw6UG5FI9HctNmcvRGusNGPfJp8PUWb3Z7UNNVnndCotSI+iqyPffCieDnhFB3FSa/Vl+ptiOlFoCH2na5soc4= Received: by 10.70.77.2 with SMTP id z2mr9029267wxa; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.118.3 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 04:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2fd864e0610080424y5bad6c83w9be90d1fca19c7d4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 06:24:38 -0500 From: Astrodog To: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2fd864e0610080423q7ba6bdeal656a223e662a5d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2fd864e0610080423q7ba6bdeal656a223e662a5d@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAXCPU alterable in kernel config - needs testers X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 11:24:40 -0000 On 10/8/06, Astrodog wrote: > With the quad core processors coming out soon, this is going to become > more of an issue.. (Sun T1/2000s aside). This is basically the same > patch from a few months ago, with updated offsets. > > If you don't define MAXCPU in the kernel config, it reverts to old > behavior. It has no logic to keep you from shooting yourself in the > foot though.. you can define options SMP and options MAXCPU 128 on > arm. > > --- Harrison Grundy > I guess including a link to the patch might help... http://72.232.65.146/~astrodog/NEWMAXCPU.diff