Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:54:04 +0300 From: "Toomas Aas" <toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee> To: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind9 vs (system)bind Message-ID: <200304111654.h3BGsbh25067@lv.raad.tartu.ee> In-Reply-To: <20030411142053.GA324@pooh.nagual.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > One question remains.. After the upgrade I had a new v8.x of named and I > already had version 9.x.x > No big deal; change the path in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and removed the > old binaries (again). Generally, one should never modify /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Put the necessary changes to /etc/rc.conf instead. > But I guess there is an option in make.conf for this to prevent the > building of named ?? Yes, indeed. The line is NO_BIND=true, as listed in /etc/defaults/make.conf. Again, you shouldn't modify /etc/defaults/make.conf but instead put the changes in /etc/make.conf. -- Toomas Aas | toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * Drive A: not responding...Formatting C: instead.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304111654.h3BGsbh25067>