Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:56:10 -0400 From: Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n Message-ID: <200906240956.10625.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On June 23, 2009 04:36:08 pm Charlie Kester wrote: > On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > >Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category > >becomes a catch all for both entities. > > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is > too long, why not go with "nls"? I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n. Thomas - -- Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD Committer tabthorpe@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~tabthorpe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpCMHoACgkQ5Gm/jNBp8qCQNACdEtpDr3bmOoZAW5dHBWKcdotn xPQAn1LGRsg+xr/csmhFaNUXhpUFqugy =HTv2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906240956.10625.tabthorpe>