From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 9 13:27: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 014F91537E for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 13:26:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from maccullagh.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 9 Nov 1999 21:26:47 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 21:26:47 +0000 From: David Malone To: Matthew Dillon Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: need patch review - NFS fixes for IP binding Message-ID: <19991109212647.A11812@maccullagh.maths.tcd.ie> References: <199911091926.LAA03009@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <199911091926.LAA03009@apollo.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 11:26:51AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Instead, I have adopted and cleaned up the kernel portions of the patch > and modified nfsd to allow the binding ip/host to be specified on the > command line. Thus nfsd can be run bound to a specific IP address. This patch isn't very good for us as we need to be able to bind nfsd to several IP addresses and still have it reply on the correct interface and I think your patch only allows one to be specified per set of nfsds? At the least we need to be able to specify multiple IP addresses and a "all IP addresses" mode, as in Ian's original patch, would be useful for us. I guess we could run bunches of nfsds - one bunch per IP, but this seems unnatural. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message