Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:07:07 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> To: Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tinderbox - tinderd and nullfs? Message-ID: <20090212090707.19a2f093@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <ef8c8a880902101207l3aeb043anb59ab6f1b45d0f90@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef8c8a880901161421p712bcfccrd496d38b19ef87d2@mail.gmail.com> <49413692@ipt.ru> <ef8c8a880901180337q423a3fd5g57d222f8d3818140@mail.gmail.com> <20090118222145.6ff13615@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <ef8c8a880902091400t14cc30a3x7aa570bd2b12c2ad@mail.gmail.com> <20090210020050.6f160713@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <ef8c8a880902101207l3aeb043anb59ab6f1b45d0f90@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/wme.HeU_V5mcOw+1W+3tMSN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:07:56 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > ps axw > > mount >=20 > Actually, it did eventually build. The reason for the time was that it > built 77 ports (dependencies?) in that run. > So, tinderbuild works. >=20 > Restarting tinderd didn't have any effect - the job in the tinderd > queue still didn't move, and nothing happened to tinderd. > Howevr, I deleted that job (from the web ui), and re-scheduled the > same port (also from the web ui). > This time it worked without problems. Strange. > Perhaps the minor upgrade from tinderbox 3.1.2_1 to 3.1.2_2 fixed the > problem? Anyway, it works now. > Thanks to everyone for their help. Don't see how. That was only small fix for non-default OPTIONS. > > If you use reply all there are better chances the other people that > > replied to your email get your message in front of their ayes ;-) >=20 > Well, IMHO such practice is a bit "intrusive" unless a person have > explicitly asked to be copied (or I really, really want to get that > person's attention). So I'll risk it. :-) Our list charter say 'reply all'; among other things because we don't require posters to be subscribed to the list they are posting on, so if you don't reply all they won't get the message. Also we consider it nice to CC the port maintainer when we post on ports@. > After all, this is a mailing list - interested parties are supposed to > to read it, right? > (I made an exception for you this time) Yeh. I'm supposed to read at least briefly about 500 messages per day from a few lists. Real life usually gets in the way. (There was a time, some 12 years back when I was in high-school, when I could afford to read to read all messages on about 15 FreeBSD mailing lists daily.). --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/wme.HeU_V5mcOw+1W+3tMSN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmTyqMACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeXDMACeJUle/IDZ/U+O3rwU+nzq5ZGw b8AAoJH5kiy1VEkCDItcX994dVDcUeG8 =e3AZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wme.HeU_V5mcOw+1W+3tMSN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090212090707.19a2f093>