From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 19:42:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AF616A5B1 for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 19:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2F243D1F for ; Fri, 13 May 2005 19:42:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org) Received: from thor.farley.org (thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:290:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4DJgKLV059425; Fri, 13 May 2005 14:42:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.farley.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4DJgNcn012672; Fri, 13 May 2005 14:42:24 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:42:23 -0500 (CDT) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_C=2E_Farley?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9_Kergourlay?= In-Reply-To: <20050513123403.J11641@thor.farley.org> Message-ID: <20050513143958.X12504@thor.farley.org> References: <428307A9.10901@atempo.com> <20050512134151.O2556@thor.farley.org> <20050512163409.O4283@thor.farley.org> <4284CFB5.7040805@atempo.com> <20050513123403.J11641@thor.farley.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1283691166-1116013343=:12504" cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting on FreeBSD 53 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 19:42:25 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1283691166-1116013343=:12504 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Fri, 13 May 2005, Se=E1n C. Farley wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2005, Herv=E9 Kergourlay wrote: > >> or if there is a workarouund ? > > Reapplying the sigsuspend() before each fork() may work. I meant sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK). Sleep deprivation by an infant destroys the mind. :) Se=E1n --=20 sean-freebsd@farley.org --0-1283691166-1116013343=:12504--