From owner-freebsd-security Wed Mar 15 12:14:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6153537BB16 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:14:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12VKBU-000FQu-00; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:14:24 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Rodrigo Campos Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wrapping sshd In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Mar 2000 16:29:48 -0300." Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:14:24 +0200 Message-ID: <59327.953151264@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 16:29:48 -0300, Rodrigo Campos wrote: > In the /etc/hosts.allow file there's a comment saying that "is not > normally a good idea" to wrapp sshd(8) The answer has nothing to do with secrurity, although you couldn't have known that without reading the sshd(8) manual page. :-) Look for the first occurance of the word inetd in the sshd(8) manual page. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message