From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 06:12:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07BA37B401; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 06:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326F343FAF; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 06:12:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5IDCcbS069545; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:12:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h5IDCbiL069544; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:12:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:12:37 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Tom Rhodes Message-ID: <20030618151237.A69426@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20030616171455.GB550@nosferatu.blackend.org> <20030616132114.368a354c.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030616211505.GC550@nosferatu.blackend.org> <20030617111355.6c8eeb90.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030617111355.6c8eeb90.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>; from trhodes@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:13:55AM -0400 X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE cc: docs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removal of some mini-faqs in the Handbook. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:12:42 -0000 On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:13:55AM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:15:05 +0200 > Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > > > > I know very well that section since I wrote it :) I just noted the > > removal of the mini-faq when I sent an user to the section 6.3 (I do > > not read every commit mail). > > The person complained about the Troubleshooting section layout. > > If you really think the new layout is better than the previous one, > > then that's Ok. My opinion is not: "keep the old layout", I just > > want something easy to read. > > By the way, you should keep the info about performance issues with > > autoselect mode on some NICs since this mode is not seen by users as > > an "incorrect network settings". > > > > For mail-trouble.html, I just hope it will be treated in a better way. > > I'm sorry if I have not given enough justice to your work, any suggestions > on improving what I did? > Well I just realized that there is no real good and easy solution to improve the layout without using the Question/Answer way :(( Anyway, it is not that important, just try to add back the "autoselect" thing to the current text, this will avoid to add it later in the future FAQ/document. Marc