From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 29 19:12:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from e028121.vtacs.vt.edu (e028121.vtacs.vt.edu [63.164.28.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D83637B403 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:12:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gaylord@e028121.vtacs.vt.edu) Received: by e028121.vtacs.vt.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 888E186DE; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:11:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:11:21 -0400 From: Clark Gaylord To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fastforwarding? Message-ID: <20010629221121.A6512@e028121.vtacs.vt.edu> References: <20010626093545.D49992@sunbay.com> <3B3AB4F8.184A2EFE@softweyr.com> <20010629075815.N55750@e028121.vtacs.vt.edu> <20010629111830.F78038@sneakerz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010629111830.F78038@sneakerz.org>; from bright@sneakerz.org on Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:18:31AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:18:31AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Clark Gaylord [010629 06:59] wrote: > > I notice the man page points out that this prevents the use of > > ipfilter, etc. The first packet(s?) do get forwarded by the usual > > process (yes?), so does this imply that at least a "deny X" would > > still work (as the first packet would get denied and hence the > > cache does not get populated)? What are the limitations to ipfw > > and friends working right in conjunction with fastforwarding? > > I really doubt that your assumptions are true. That's why I pose it as a question... Clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message