From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sun May 22 18:54:04 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D89DB459B8
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 22 May 2016 18:54:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu)
Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu
 [IPv6:2a00:c98:2200:af07:6::1])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0BC1B86
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 22 May 2016 18:54:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu)
Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 9708661FD7; Sun, 22 May 2016 20:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 20:54:00 +0200
From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff <stdin@niklaas.eu>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: tinc and IPv6 routing, or: how to set up a local IPv6
Message-ID: <20160522185400.GB24569@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <04e2cb6c-f8c3-7d30-dd53-ca18870c4598@seacom.mu>
 <20160520065857.GA59066@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <545832b8-d7df-9858-82c4-dfe9cc4c7023@seacom.mu>
 <20160520072052.GB59066@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <259f3563-b943-b75f-5d4b-92d3d39aa0ca@seacom.mu>
 <20160520090118.GA26491@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu>
 <573b2023-88f3-df1d-146f-c32ddfabf406@seacom.mu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <573b2023-88f3-df1d-146f-c32ddfabf406@seacom.mu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 18:54:04 -0000

Mark Tinka [2016-05-20 17:33 +0200] :

> On 20/May/16 11:01, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote:
> 
> > OK, thanks for the advice. I haven't grasped how IPv6 works
> > completely yet. So, NAT66 is for prefix rewriting, right?
> 
> NAT66 is the equivalent of NAT44.
> 
> >  Where would I need that?
> 
> I'd say never. NAT66 is mostly being used by those are like NAT44.
> 
> NAT44 is useful because IPv4 addresses are in short supply. IPv6 is
> not in short supply, so NAT66 is not that useful, but that's just my
> opinion.

Okay, I get that. But I do not quite get how that was related to my
question?

> > Simple routing (as I tried to achieve) doesn't work here?
> 
> Have you tried it without the firewall? Technically, I can't see
> a reason why it's not working, despite it being ULA.

I just disabled the firewall and tried it -- but without success.

> Don't wait. Get your IPv6 going sooner rather than later.
> 
> I'd advise to use GUA's instead, but for your internal purposes, ULA's
> will work too.

I guess, I'll send a similar inquiry to tinc's mailinglist. Maybe the
issue is indeed related to tinc itself.

Anyway, thanks a lot for your advice!

    Niklaas