From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jun  9 16:30:33 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5523F14EFC
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 1999 16:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 10rrnf-00079i-00
	for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 01:30:27 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Supprting twist for inetd with libwrap (solved)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Jun 1999 23:34:36 +0200."
             <22705.928964076@axl.noc.iafrica.com> 
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 01:30:27 +0200
Message-ID: <27509.928971027@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 23:34:36 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

> It suddenly occured to me while I was testing this that I might be
> going to a lot of trouble under the misguided assumption that a fork is
> expensive. Am I wrong?

Please disregard my previous post. I was working around a bug I
introduced myself.

Thanks,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message