From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 3 08:35:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494C0ED2 for ; Fri, 3 May 2013 08:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [188.252.31.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB00E1E94 for ; Fri, 3 May 2013 08:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r438ZGBV052994; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:35:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r438ZG7R052991; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:35:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 10:35:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Amit Rawat Subject: Re: My GSOC proposal for review In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 May 2013 10:35:16 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:35:26 -0000 point c. is what i would like the most and is really the most important for NON embedded system. others for embedded ones. d. won't really cut much f. may not save much but slow things down i wish you a success. On Thu, 2 May 2013, Amit Rawat wrote: > Hi, > > I am attaching my gsoc proposal with this mail for review. If any body want > any extra thing in it they can mail. > > Thanks, > Amit Rawat >