From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 28 14:15:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894EF16A41F
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:15:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mocart@pinco.pl)
Received: from pinco.pl (gw-z-futuro.pinco.pl [62.233.197.58])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CEF743D48
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:15:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mocart@pinco.pl)
Received: (qmail 51952 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Oct 2005 14:18:06 -0000
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:18:06 +0200
From: =?utf-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz?= Dudek <mocart@pinco.pl>
To: Daniel Dias =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gon=E7alves?= <daniel@dgnetwork.com.br>
Message-ID: <20051028141806.GA51784@pinco.pl>
References: <4361FE7E.50607@dgnetwork.com.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4361FE7E.50607@dgnetwork.com.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Load Balancing Outgoing, its possible ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:15:40 -0000

Dnia Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:33:34AM -0200, Daniel Dias Gonçalves napisał(a):
> 
> It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some software 
> that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
> This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the user 
> of NAT or IP valid ?
> If it is possible, wanted to see examples with rules.
> 

it is possible.


#BALANCING TWO INTERNET CONNECTIONS
#
#People who have multiple net connections and are unable to use a proper
#multipath routing solution (ie. BGP4) can use this to balance *outgoing*
#traffic across the two connections, with something like this:
#
#
nat on $ext_if1 from $int_subnet to any -> ($ext_if1)
nat on $ext_if2 from $int_subnet to any -> ($ext_if2)
#
## routing for internal subnets
pass in on $int_if \
#	route-to { ( $ext_if1 $gateway1), ( $ext_if2 $gateway2 ) } round-robin \
#	from $int_subnet to any keep state
#
## need the next rules to properly pass traffic to/from the external IPs
pass out on $ext_if2 route-to ($ext_if1 $gateway1) from $ext_if1 to any 
pass out on $ext_if1 route-to ($ext_if2 $gateway2) from $ext_if2 to any 
#
#
#Please note that this is only the skeleton of a ruleset that would work
#in such a situation; care must be taken to ensure that the correct
route-to options are put on each rule which needs to be balanced

pozdr
mocart