From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 02:41:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9D037B401; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 02:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2E043F85; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 02:41:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfl1t.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.212.61] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19SZRj-00035V-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 02:41:40 -0700 Message-ID: <3EF0331A.2F2CF1DB@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 02:38:34 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey References: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org> <20030617.060806.42773474.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030618023138.GE93137@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030618034838.GJ93137@wantadilla.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a481ce3f1802cab5bdb3bff33d1fd468da666fa475841a1c7a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Interview in Byte with Chris Sontag/SCO and FUD relating toBSDsettlement agreement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:41:41 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Yes, it reminded me of that thread, but wkt was actually referring to > System III, not 32V. I am also pretty certain that it was widely stated at the time that the UCB's license was the older Western Electric license, which is the same license which allowed Lyon's to publish his commentary, legally, including the kernel source code. While the university, proper, did obtain a more modern license, that license could not be retroactive to change the terms of the original license. The original licenses were very lenient in their terms, since, at the time, the 1956 consent decreee prohibited them from making money from software sales, as part of their being a regulated monopoly at the time. It was only later, after the breakup, that they were permitted to profit from sales of their software. And that's when license fees went up. -- Terry