From owner-freebsd-ipfw Thu Feb 28 0:45: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mumba.junik.lv (mail.junik.lv [195.216.160.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC6737B405 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 00:44:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mumba.junik.lv (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA23154 for freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:44:47 +0200 Received: from Adam ([213.182.205.3]) by mumba.junik.lv (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA23070 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:44:42 +0200 Message-ID: <174101c1c034$87303380$03cdb6d5@junik.lv> From: "Adam@junik.lv" To: Subject: pass tcp from any to any established Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:47:17 +0200 X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I would really appreciate it if you could cast some light upon this issue: Is it at all possible that the ipfw rule: ipfw add pass tcp from any to any established can be abused by intruders? Any input, no matter theoretical or real-life, will be highly appreciated! Many thanks in anticipation, Adam ______________________________________ Scanned and protected by Inflex http://pldaniels.com/inflex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message