From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 06:51:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A72716A4BF for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FD443F3F for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 06:50:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 19yXH6-0001Lu-00 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:50:57 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:50:48 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Subject: EMCsq/SAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:51:00 -0000 hi all, Any experiance with EMCsq./SAN? I know FreeBSD is not on their list, but was wondering if it works even without the 'qualified' stamp. If not, then is there some recomendation for any other SAN? thanks, danny