From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 7 10:12:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359F616B1FA for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@freebsd.org) Received: from relay1.beelinegprs.ru (relay1.beelinegprs.ru [217.118.71.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E1943D45 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@freebsd.org) Received: from relay1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1 (Postfix) with SMTP id F1F1135D20; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:18:15 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [172.23.27.139] (clusterfw.beelinegprs.com [217.118.66.232]) by relay1.beelinegprs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931B035D0E; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:18:12 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <448699CC.1080108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:18:04 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060429) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <20060607030548.GD72368@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20060607030548.GD72368@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamtest-Info: License expired Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:12:45 -0000 Kostik Belousov wrote: > This was relevant at least some time ago, and, I think, still holds. > In fact, this is my biggest issue with portupgrade. > > When installing new port, portupgrade shall install all dependencies > itself. This way customization of the ports knobs in pkgtools.conf > would be honored. I do not know whether this could be done by changes > to portupgrade only or the help from the ports infrastructure is > required. > Still holds. There should be some functionality that did not write yet. Will do. -- Dixi. Sem.