Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:15:50 -0500 From: Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, dev@subversion.tigris.org Subject: Re: devel/subversion* ports and www/neon26 Message-ID: <20080605001550.GA3906@p12n.org> In-Reply-To: <20080604090234.GC12977@jack.stsp.name> References: <1212506706.15220.16.camel@localhost> <20080604090234.GC12977@jack.stsp.name>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (Seen on dev@subversion.tigris.org) > On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote: > > Since www/neon28 was moved into ports, subversion still depends upon > > www/neon26 (which conflicts w/ 2.8). I have been able to tell subversion > > to use neon 2.8 by modifying the subversion Makefile appropriately. Is > > there any specific reason to not move subversion to default to use > > www/neon28 instead of www/neon26 ? As Stefan has said, Subversion 1.4 does not support neon 0.28. However, we are using it in Debian unstable, with the following patch: svn export svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-subversion/trunk/debian/patches/neon27 (The patch name reflects the fact that neon 0.28 is API-compatible with neon 0.27.) --=20 Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIRzA1Xk7sIRPQRh0RAtCrAJ9QgcO3UtDsi56pDQxuIP8uBpxgCwCgwR8u qJ1FODcBs7iIYsgV7pCdbvo= =RUrH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080605001550.GA3906>