From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 23 17: 0:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B8437B401 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 17:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5NNxwCV080271; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:59:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5NNxwW0080270; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:59:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 16:59:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200206232359.g5NNxwW0080270@apollo.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Julian Elischer , Alan Cox , Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in wakeup() (stable and current) ? References: <200206232014.g5NKE5x3058562@apollo.backplane.com> <20020623201933.GM53232@elvis.mu.org> <200206232032.g5NKWVZW063483@apollo.backplane.com> <20020623234714.GN53232@elvis.mu.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :You're right, but other than await() why would a process find itself :on a sleep queue if not in SSLEEP? : :-- :-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] I think we may be ok on -stable, but -current definitely hits the case (at least it does with Julian's KSE branch). Threads have considerably more blocking states in -current then processes do in -stable. Either that or there are races in -current that we don't know about. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message