From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 25 22:00:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC1D106566B for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9A38FC15 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.175.178.246] (helo=moosi) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MUpIJ-000A7Y-6N; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:00:43 +0400 To: Alexander Kabaev References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090725115525.GA85767@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725123749.GA26505@abigail.blackend.org> <46928623@ipt.ru> <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:01:57 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> (Alexander Kabaev's message of "Sat\, 25 Jul 2009 10\:50\:20 -0400") Message-ID: <32688442@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:00:45 -0000 Rerouting from stable@ to emulation@ as it may be a serious matter. Alexander Kabaev writes: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400 > Boris Samorodov wrote: >> >> As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very >> helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both >> linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better >> then flashplugin[7|9]. > > It does not work very well under Linux32 compat on -current - our futex > implementation seems to be too broken and causes frequent deadlock and > causes multiple threads to get stuck on process exit. One can easily > collect dozens of those stuck processes doing causal web browsing. Can anybody comment on this? Thanks! -- WBR, bsam