From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  5 03:46:46 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90B637B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 03:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua
	[212.110.138.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB1B43F85
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 03:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua)
Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	h55AkVEd049894
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:46:31 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h55AkKbU049870;
	Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:46:20 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from ru)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:46:20 +0300
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>
Message-ID: <20030605104620.GA47983@sunbay.com>
References: <200306042042.h54KgoHh007445@grimreaper.grondar.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200306042042.h54KgoHh007445@grimreaper.grondar.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 10:46:47 -0000


--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:42:50PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
[...]
> I propose to 'cvs rm' the 'base' telnet, and build base telnet by
> not defining the appropriate macros.
>=20
> secure/ and kerberos5/ will then no longer need private copies of
> (lib)telnet(d), and 'make world' will simplify.
>=20
Yes, please.  I am all for it, if we're going to vote.  ;)

> The downside is that base telnet will depend on src/crypto/telnet,
> so folks in dodgy countries which don't allow them to have crypto
> source will not be able to do telnet development, and they will
> not get a "fresh" telnet[d] after a make world.
>=20
> Comments? I'm keen to go on this.
>=20
I'm not so sure about this.  If it would be possible to extract
the crypto bits of the telnet sources to separate source files,
and leave them under src/crypto/, I think that would be the best,
but if it's too hard, well, the price could be paid.

Still, even if we decide to leave both copies of sources,
reducing the number of (lib)telnet(d) makefiles to one set
is the way to go.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software Ltd,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+3x98Ukv4P6juNwoRAguUAJ9HSkXmXo01BEfPCx2+wCt1u8K5DACfV51H
fj5W/pACpktN4QTanIG6bGk=
=Y69e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--