From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 12:10:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A106716A4CE for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:10:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.telecom.by (mail.telecom.by [213.184.225.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9358143D48 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:09:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barzog@telecom.by) Received: from ADMIN1 (barzog-ipsec.telecom.by [172.16.2.12] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.telecom.by (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9KC8Z5V022876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:08:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from barzog@telecom.by) Message-ID: <004001c4b69d$80e21f40$0c0210ac@ADMIN1> From: "Oleg Gawriloff" To: Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:08:26 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on martin.telecom.by Subject: decreasing interrupt CPU load X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:10:20 -0000 Hello! Currently we have router on FreeBSD 4.10-R on SMP 2*PIII 1Ghz. 5sec average traffic trhough fxp on Intel 82550 is about 12kpps (26Mbit/sec). CPU Load on interrupts shown in top and systat -v 1 always above 40%. We've tried to enable polling with HZ=1000, but cpu load does not change, instead round trip time increased from 1ms to 20ms. Also we've tried link0, no success. Is any other options to decrease interrupt cpu load? May be enabling fast forwarding, change fxp to em or bge NIC? Is there exist any drawbacks from enabling fast forwarding? With best regards, Oleg Gawriloff.