From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 25 06:02:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69A716A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B7143D55 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 06:02:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BHjHH-0001ZG-KX; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:02:35 +0200 Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:02:35 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040425130235.GA5122@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , Oliver Eikemeier , Kris Kennaway , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org References: <200404241020.i3OAKK3p030516@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040424103137.GA27242@xor.obsecurity.org> <408BA870.3000908@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <408BA870.3000908@fillmore-labs.com> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ports/65926: Allow to use only numbers in PORTREVISION/PORTEPOCH X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 13:02:34 -0000 Hi, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I tend to agree. I'm also worried about the impact it would have on > INDEX build times. I did the test INDEX build and here are the results: Without patch: make index 503.92s user 302.82s system 94% cpu 14:18.11 total With patch: make index 500.59s user 317.07s system 98% cpu 13:52.12 total So as you can see there is nothing to worry about. > Semi-tangentially, I'd like to one day set up a portlint tinderbox > that lists portlint warnings and errors in ports, and monitors for > changes. Yeah, it's good idea, but at first we need to clean out portlint a little, eg to fix warnings about present .la files etc -Kirill