Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:08:09 +0100 From: Alberto Villa <avilla@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, x11@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fix nvidia-like ports, help needed Message-ID: <201202231008.09849.avilla@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120223072132.GB88092@azathoth.lan> References: <20120222222544.GA88092@azathoth.lan> <20120223013502.GA78308@FreeBSD.org> <20120223072132.GB88092@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thursday 23 February 2012 08:21:33 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Why not but which package will provide the libGL.so file? in all case the > users might need to be able to switch the libGL.so file from the nvidia > one to the mesa one, what would a user have to do for that, in particular > a user using only binary packages where a file can't belong to 2 different > packages without conflicting? Something like splitting libGL.so and making a mesa-libgl-whatever port? Then mark CONFLICTS, and replacing that with nvidia-driver will be easy. Won't it? -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avilla@FreeBSD.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla Dear Lord: I just want *_o_n_e* one-armed manager so I never have to hear "On the other hand", again. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iJwEAAECAAYFAk9GAfkACgkQ3xiC6kQ1CotuFAP/VesZC+ulxbnZ63VeKUtFz0yU YOFoRhQ5wZOsDNgK7T7JEfMOYSkX6qYbdq4j80KUKfqPN/xBMWN0veygy3li+115 2x0wPj/4VectN+2tpyIutX0Hm67a4Dt0OjZGAPKvCcB0hbZeR2/Xlyb9+HDX54tI GmllDjHOluxTGVDsjJY= =UL6E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201202231008.09849.avilla>