From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jan  5  7:56:56 2001
From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  5 07:56:54 2001
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from tao.org.uk (unknown [194.128.198.234])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4EA7337B400; Fri,  5 Jan 2001 07:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id 9AE343243; Fri,  5 Jan 2001 15:56:51 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:56:51 +0000
From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
To: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Graham Wheeler <gram@cequrux.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>,
	hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Just how standard is APM?
Message-ID: <20010105155651.C1835@tao.org.uk>
References: <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> <200101050757.f057vbt03988@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200101050757.f057vbt03988@mass.osd.bsdi.com>; from msmith@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:57:37PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:57:37PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Warner Losh wrote:
> > > 
> > > APM is standard.  Except when it is broken in some brain damaged ways.
> > > 
> > > However, you likely have your apm device disabled in your kernel and
> > > all you need to do is enable it.
> > > 
> > 
> > Nope - as I said, I added log messages to apm.c to log the BIOS probe
> > and they log a failure (I have "device apm0" in my config file).
> 
> How new is this laptop?  It may be ACPI-only.

Where are we at with ACPI?  Does it do power management yet?

Joe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message