From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:03:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68D816A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:03:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6028B43D2D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UK47Mt074099; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:04:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <415C664D.7050301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:02:21 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20040929030546.GE16305@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040930174100.GA1090@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040930174100.GA1090@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: Ken Smith cc: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: Library version number bumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:03:22 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:34:44PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >>At 11:05 PM -0400 9/28/04, Ken Smith wrote: >> >>>>From the "Better late than never" Department... >>> >>>It looks like we should probably bump the version of a couple of >>>the system libraries. With LOTS of help from Kris it looks like >>>this is the list we think needs a version bump, with the version >> >>>from 4.X being placed in compat4x: >> >>> libgnuregex.so.2 >>> libhistory.so.4 >>> libm.so.2 >>> libncurses.so.5 >>> libopie.so.2 >>> libpcap.so.2 >>> libreadline.so.4 >>> libwrap.so.3 >>> >>>The bumps will be coming soon... >> >>Does this include bumping the version number on C++ related >>libraries, as requested in the message on "5.3, libstc++, gcc34" >>on Sept 15th? > > > 5.x has already had lots of incompatible changes requiring you to > recompile older binaries, and the above is going to be another one > (that's the price of fixing compat with 4.x). > > Kris To answer it a different way, 'no'. libstdc++ was already bumped for 5.x, so there are no 4.x->5.x shlib number problems there. Scott