From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 16 20:36:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE801065672; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFEC8FC1D; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5063E1FFC51; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 28EE58457A; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:36:51 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Attilio Rao References: <3bbf2fe11002151610l41526f55r5e60b5e46ce42b64@mail.gmail.com> <20100216195440.GF50403@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <3bbf2fe11002161158k79c09e91w1b459ab16e14b7b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:36:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe11002161158k79c09e91w1b459ab16e14b7b1@mail.gmail.com> (Attilio Rao's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:58:06 +0100") Message-ID: <86iq9wor30.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Kostik Belousov , FreeBSD Arch , Ed Maste Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding shared code support for ia32 and amd64 -- x86 sub-branch X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:36:52 -0000 Attilio Rao writes: > Kostik Belousov writes: > > IMO the diff is unreadable. I suggest to do actual svn cp (not svn > > mv) operation now, without a review, and post a diff that should be > > applied to x86/ directory, as well as to build glue. > I'm not sure what you mean here. I also thought svn mv was keeping the > file history (the old cvsup repocopy) and handling directly the svn > del. What he's saying is: - svn cp the files - generate and review a patch - apply the patch - fix the Makefiles - svn rm the old copies which would also preserve history. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no