From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 19 00:34:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA14292 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:34:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu (root@RICH.ISDN.BCM.TMC.EDU [128.249.250.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA14274 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 00:34:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rich@localhost) by rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id CAA03359; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 02:34:11 -0600 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 02:34:11 -0600 Message-Id: <199603190834.CAA03359@rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu> From: Rich Murphey To: hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199603172003.VAA03617@mordillo> (message from Thomas Graichen on Sun, 17 Mar 1996 21:03:46 +0100 (MET)) Subject: Re: Mathematica under FreeBSD Reply-to: rich@lamprey.utmb.edu Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I heard from Thomas Graichen that the mathematica floating licence manager does not work correctly with FreeBSD. I just thought I'd mention that my success with Mathematica was with a machine-specific licences. I don't run a separate license server but rather installed a 'mathpass' file on a single machine. You run 'mathinfo' on that machine, give the output of 'mathinfo' to the Wolfram sales department and they gave you a valid 'mathpass' entry which you install on the machine which you intend to run mathematica. That doesn't solve the prolbem if you really do want a floating 'network' license, but I can tell you that this works just fine. Rich