From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Jul 8 15:28:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698E2D9C50D; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 15:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419DD83C32; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 15:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 83C0643DD; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 15:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 15:28:16 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Matthew Rezny Cc: Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r445016 - in head/x11/libxshmfence: . files Message-ID: <20170708152816.GA96824@FreeBSD.org> References: <201707041347.v64Dlkx7028953@repo.freebsd.org> <2370475.W49dQvnFxO@workstation.reztek> <4854339.z0ub1xhMfD@workstation.reztek> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4854339.z0ub1xhMfD@workstation.reztek> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 15:28:17 -0000 On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 03:45:08PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote: > [...] > Regarding beignet specifically, that is one I bumped along but cannot test. > I've been trying to pick up everything under the x11 umbrella because it > wasn't being done otherwise, but my interests (Xorg and Mesa, for Radeon, > pre-GPU ^^^^^^^ Shall I read it as pre-GCN (I hope so, as this is my interest as well)? > are not as broad as the entire team needs to be; we could use more active > members and/or offload some things that aren't really graphics, e.g. OpenCL. I concur; I have a feeling that recent Mesa/DRI updates are tested primarily on Intel's crappy^Whardware, often leaving AMD users with less tendance (e.g. PR 220444, albeit I recall I got regular mplayer -vo xv broken on one of the earlier Mesa/DRI updates as well). Also: PR 214204, and the fact that drm-next does not work on my A8-5550M at all (it hangs or reboots upon kldloading radeonkms -- cannot retest it right now as I'm in the process of debugging some ACPI issues under Ubuntu). ./danfe