Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:30:08 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Message-ID: <86fy764k9b.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20070411214911.GA38351@VARK.MIT.EDU> (David Schultz's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:49:11 -0400") References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <86k5wo55s0.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070407203411.GJ8831@cicely12.cicely.de> <86wt0n3mxv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070411214911.GA38351@VARK.MIT.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > Any ideas how ZFS and GEOM are going to work out, given that ZFS > is designed to be the filesystem + volume manager in one? Pawel has seveal years' experience writing GEOM classes, and ZFS plays along nicely with GEOM. You can create zpools on any kind of GEOM provider, and attach any kind of GEOM consumer to zvols. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fy764k9b.fsf>