Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:52:49 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: do we care about performance yet?
Message-ID:  <15044.40385.937863.333900@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103301132230.56601-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
References:  <15044.1867.943183.224703@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103301132230.56601-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Doug Rabson writes:
 > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > 
 > >
 > > FWIW, I ran a make buildworld this evening on my UP1000 under iprobe,
 > > as well as with the receive side of a netperf tcp stream.
 > >
 > > (for anybody who doesn't know what iprobe is, check out
 > > http://www.cs.duke.edu/ari/iprobe)
 > >
 > > For the buildworld, the system spent about 40% of its time in kernel.
 > > Roughly 50% of that was in various states of idleness.  I've left full
 > > reports at:
 > >
 > > http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin/iprobe_current/
 > >
 > > The "???NOT_FOUND" is userland code I didn't tell iprobe about.
 > 
 > I think this is just showing a lot of contention for the Giant mutex (and
 > probably some i/o waiting). Since we don't halt on idle, the cpu will
 > spend a lot of time buzzlooping on runq_check.
 > 

Yes, certainly.  And using lots of power too ;-(

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15044.40385.937863.333900>