From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 21 14:04:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF5B16A4CE for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:04:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from out014.verizon.net (out014pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EC143D1D for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:04:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([68.160.202.196]) by out014.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040221220408.SFZE19064.out014.verizon.net@mac.com>; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:04:08 -0600 Message-ID: <4037D5D7.8030700@mac.com> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:04:07 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Landman References: <20040221052137.GL24309@hardesty.saintaardvarkthecarpeted.com> <6.0.0.22.0.20040221092538.05e6dc48@pop.face2interface.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040221092538.05e6dc48@pop.face2interface.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out014.verizon.net from [68.160.202.196] at Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:04:08 -0600 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP access X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:04:09 -0000 Marty Landman wrote: > At 12:21 AM 2/21/2004, Saint Aardvark the Carpeted wrote: [ ... ] > As you can see only the gateway and one other box (5 total on my lan) > were cached. After pinging penguin it got into the cache but this looks > like arp is unreliable for a canonical list of plugged in ip's. > > Curious about what would work. Nmap(8) isn't installed on my system now, > is this the way to go? Nothing in my base install to do it? "nmap -sP 22 192.168.0.0/24" should do it (although nmap may pause on .0), but you can also try: ping 192.168.0.255 ...although not everything responds to a broadcast addr ping, but it's still useful. -- -Chuck