From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 15 20:41:50 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA03952 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Apr 1996 20:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from news.widomaker.com (news2.widomaker.com [204.17.220.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA03942 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 1996 20:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from escape by news.widomaker.com with uucp (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0u91e0-000A0QC; Mon, 15 Apr 96 23:41 EDT Received: by escape (Smail3.1.29.1 #6) id m0u92VN-0004QIC; Mon, 15 Apr 96 23:36 EST Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 23:36:41 -0500 (EST) From: Reflectorizer X-Sender: tangier@localhost To: dyson@freebsd.org cc: Andreas Klemm , joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, groudier@iplus.fr, hackers@freebsd.org, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Unices are created equal, but ... In-Reply-To: <199604142322.SAA00427@dyson.iquest.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 14 Apr 1996, John S. Dyson wrote: > > Whole Linux seems to be a memory file system ;-) They are caching > > like hell. Only benchmarks like bonnie on files of about 3xRAMSIZE On this note... is there any way to easily limit the amount of cache Linux is using? I don't see it with bdflush parameters but maybe it would not be too hard to put a limit in the kernel.