From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep  4 13:16:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA00221
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etinc.com (etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA00185
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 13:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dialup-usr11.etinc.com (dialup-usr11.etinc.com [204.141.95.132]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA08228 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 16:19:51 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 16:19:51 -0400
Message-Id: <199609042019.QAA08228@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: hackers@freebsd.org
From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis)
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions)
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Hi,
>
>I just thought I'd mention that Mike O'Brien in his lastest article in
>Sun Expert, mentions FreeBSD and says:
>
>"FreeBSD runs on Intel platforms and provides the what is probably the most
> robust and capable TCP/IP stack in existence..."

Sure sounds like an opinion to me :-)

Dennis