From nobody Mon Mar 6 15:37:23 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-src-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PVjPg36G0z3x1x2; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [95.217.20.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PVjPf15qkz3rSF; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of des@des.no designates 95.217.20.81 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=des@des.no; dmarc=none Received: from ltc.des.no (unknown [84.210.219.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 905194B389; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:37:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ltc.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 305401069F3; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:37:23 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: rgrimes@freebsd.org, Cy Schubert , Juraj Lutter , src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 1d577bedbae8 - main - unbound: Fix config file path In-Reply-To: <202303031402.323E2FEN066412@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> (Rodney W. Grimes's message of "Fri, 3 Mar 2023 06:02:15 -0800 (PST)") References: <202303031402.323E2FEN066412@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (berkeley-unix) Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 16:37:23 +0100 Message-ID: <86mt4psxfw.fsf@ltc.des.no> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the src repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[des]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[des.no]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:95.217.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org,dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PVjPf15qkz3rSF X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N "Rodney W. Grimes" writes: > "Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > No. Unbound knows it's chrooted, knows _where_ it's chrooted, and > > adjusts config paths accordingly, cf. e4c53d3bf00a. > We disagree then, rather strongly, about this issue. It should not > know it is chrooted, and it especially should NOT adjust paths > based on that fact. That is a POLA, and it is also hard coding > POLICY into an executable. Almost certainly any path mangling > done because it is chroot is going to break if I chroot it to > some place very different. With all due respect, you're talking out of your ass. > > Also note that the local-unbound configuration is not meant to be > > user-serviceable. > That, again IMHO, is a rather SIC stance to take for a caching > DNS server, especially one as flexable as unbound. The local-unbound service is not a caching DNS server. If that's what you want there are plenty of options in ports, including Unbound. The local-unbound service is a caching resolver which is supposed to Just Work even in the most difficult ciscumstances (roaming laptops, captive portals, DNS-intercepting CPE, etc.) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no