From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 17 20:13:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4597316A41F
	for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:13:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E351243D46
	for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:13:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9HKDAvD024239;
	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:13:10 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9HKDARp024238;
	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:13:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:13:09 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Message-ID: <20051017201309.GA24171@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>,
	Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20051017044005.GA11725@nagual.pp.ru>
	<1129524254.49644.5.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
	<20051017061625.GA13905@nagual.pp.ru>
	<op.syr2g4dm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<20051017160945.GB21311@nagual.pp.ru>
	<op.sysxzi1p9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<20051017181759.GA22758@nagual.pp.ru>
	<op.sys2nppc9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
	<20051017195421.GA23837@nagual.pp.ru>
	<op.sys3fqo99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <op.sys3fqo99aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: firefox: Xft + FreeType2, is it possible?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:13:19 -0000

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 03:05:40PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> What's the difference? How does it causes problem? mkfontscale and  
> mkfontdir create the first one.

At least 'monospaced' make obvious difference for programs which search 
monospaced fonts, like firefox, etc. For "book" and "m" I don't exactly 
remember where they are used.

ttmkfdir without -p option (and pango) simple can't fetch this information 
from the font and use standard (wrong) placeholders.

In few words, the difference is correct/incorrect description of the 
minor font parameters.

> You know what, I don't think I can add tahoma in fonts.dir....because  

I mention you need to strip it out under number 1) in some of my replies:
> 1) Strip out of there 'tahoma' lines (not part of webfonts) and reduce
> count.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/